Andrea Benjamin, Ph.D.
andrea.benjamin@ou.edu
Associate Professor
University of Oklahoma
Andrea Benjamin earned her Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 2010. Her research interests include Race and Politics, Local Elections and Voting behavior, and Public Opinion. Her first book, Racial Coalition Building in Local Elections: Elite Cues and Cross-Ethnic Voting, explores the potential for Black and Latino Coalitions in local elections. Using the Co-Ethnic Elite Cues Theory, the book shows that Blacks and Latinos rely on endorsements from co-ethnic leaders when casting their ballots. This is especially true when race and ethnicity are salient in the campaign. This book is available from Cambridge University Press and Amazon. Andrea Benjamin is currently working on a project about coalitions, electoral representation, and policy representation in local politics. A majority of the data come from Durham, NC. Dr. Benjamin lives in Oklahoma City and she currently serves on the Boards of Sally’s List, North East Oklahoma City Renaissance, and the Oklahoma ACLU. She is also a co-chair of the Human Rights Commission Task Force in Oklahoma City. Andrea Benjamin is originally from Northern California and completed her undergraduate degree at the University of California, Davis.
Research Interests
Urban Politics
Race, Ethnicity and Politics
Political Participation
Elections, Election Administration, and Voting Behavior
Endorsements
Co-Ethnic Cues
My Research:
My research focuses on scholarship in American Politics and broadly speaks to Race and Politics, Voting Behavior, Identity, Endorsements, Local Politics, Experiments, and Racial Attitudes. More recently, using both qualitative and quantitative methods, I have been interested in focusing on the multi-faceted puzzle of Black and Latino voting behavior in local elections from multiple perspectives and offer an elite driven theory, the Co-Ethnic Elite Cues Theory that helps explain the variation in vote patterns observed in recent elections. The population of the United States is changing and, in many of the major cities, this means greater racial and ethnic diversity. Previously, scholars focused on cities as the sites to study the ways new groups incorporate into the political process. Scholars found that groups relied heavily on their own ethnic identity when casting their ballots. Additionally, working with other groups to form coalitions was an important strategy for new groups to gain access to the political power structure. Yet, even as we have seen the racial and ethnic composition of cities change, there has been little focus on the relationship between racial and ethnic identity and political behavior. Recent mayoral elections in Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, and New York show that racial and ethnic groups often do vote together as blocs. Given their shared status as minorities and their shared experiences with discrimination, some scholars suggest that Blacks and Latinos might be natural partners, while others have found that their negative feelings towards one another prevent them from forming alliances altogether. On this point, the recent mayoral elections show a mixed pattern of cross-ethnic voting (out-group candidate support) and suggest the reliance on coalitions or alliance formation may no longer be a favored strategy. Many mayoral elections are non-partisan and voters may not have a lot of information about the candidates. My work seeks to explain these differences in vote behavior observed in Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, and New York. What explains the variation in vote choice among Blacks and Latinos in these mayoral elections? I have developed the Co-Ethnic Elite Cues Theory to explain these differences in voter behavior. Research ProjectsInformed by the issues relating to race, politics, and voting behavior described above, my current research encompasses a book and a set of related articles on the Co-Ethnic Elite Cues Theory that I developed. I also describe some of the other articles I have completed that contribute to my research agenda. The motivating puzzle discussed above has shaped my research agenda. While ethnic politics was once a major focus in political science, this is no longer the case, even as cities are growing more ethnically diverse. Most city elections are non-partisan and often voters have very little information about the candidates. Under the right circumstances, racial and ethnic identity still matters in local elections and, as a result, endorsements from members of a shared racial/ethnic group can provide voters with a useful cue or heuristic in the voting booth.In Racial Coalition Building in Local Elections: Elite Cues and Cross-Ethnic Voting, I consider the puzzle of Black and Latino electoral coalitions in mayoral elections. Given their shared status as minorities and their shared experiences with discrimination, some scholars suggest that Blacks and Latinos might be natural partners, while others have found that their negative feelings towards one another prevent them from forming stable alliances. If one group is not the numerical majority in the city, political elites may rely on coalitions as a route to ensure their group or someone who will help their group has access to politics and political benefits. Coalitions are most likely formed when there is a shared set of interests between groups. Once a coalition has been formed, I argue that co-ethnic elites signal this coalition to voters via endorsements. These endorsements are meant to convey the message to voters that this candidate is good for our group. Voters will be most receptive to this message when they are thinking about race and ethnicity. I present the Co-Ethnic Elite Cues Theory to explain how groups can gain access to political benefits for their own members, particularly when an in-group candidate or co-ethnic is not an option. The Co-Ethnic Elite Cues Theory helps us understand when cross-ethnic coalitions emerge and when they do not. I use a multi-method approach to test my theory using exit poll data, newspaper coverage, experimental data, and survey data to show its relevance by revisiting recent elections in several major US cities. By looking at a number of recent elections across the major cities of our country, I demonstrate that cross-ethnic minority voting coalitions are an important element in deciding who becomes mayor, which groups are incorporated into politics, and how voters respond to the campaigns. I explore these dynamics by looking at how voters respond to elite cues and how elite-level strategists anticipate the reactions of voters. My findings suggest that Blacks and Latinos are willing to engage in cross-ethnic voting under certain conditions. In an experiment fielded among Black and Latino adults, I vary the race of the candidate, the presence of co-ethnic endorsements, and the racial/ethnic salience of the campaign. I show that the theory works quite well for Blacks. When presented with a Latino candidate, with a Black endorsement in a racially salient campaign, Black subjects overwhelmingly supported the Latino candidate. These results lead me to conclude that Latino candidates need to seek out Black endorsements in order to win over Black voters. Latino candidates can do even better among Black voters when race is salient. White candidates need endorsements and race to be salient in order to win the Black vote. The pattern among Latinos is mixed. While Latinos did not prefer any of the candidates, regardless of endorsements, race of the candidate, or the ethnic saliency in campaigns, they were willing to indicate that an endorsed Black candidate was more sympathetic to Latino issues; and this effect held whether ethnicity was salient or not. Additionally, Latinos believe that the White candidate with a Latino endorsement when ethnicity was salient is extremely sympathetic to Latino issues. Building on these results, I test the Co-Ethnic Elite Cues Theory in a real-world election (the Los Angeles Mayoral Election of 2013). I measure vote choice and knowledge of endorsements and show that Blacks in Los Angeles used co-ethnic endorsements when casting their votes, even when I control for partisanship, ideology, and issues. Among Latinos, the data in Los Angeles the relationship is weaker, just like in the experiments. While Latinos relied on some Co-ethnic endorsements when casting their vote (the Spanish language newspaper), other endorsements were not as persuasive (those from politicians and celebrities).I then test the Co-Ethnic Elite Cues Theory further with additional experimental data using a nationally representative sample of Black, Latino, and White adults. I manipulate the race of the candidate and the presence of a co-ethnic endorsement, but I also have a treatment where the candidate asks voters to support him in the context of a Black-Latino coalition. Blacks and Latinos do not distinguish between the co-ethnic endorsement treatment and the treatment with a co-ethnic endorsement in the context of the coalition, so I combine them for the analyses. I find that Blacks and Latinos are both more likely to vote cross-ethnically when there are co-ethnic endorsements in the context of a Black-Latino coalition. I also explore how White voters respond to these Black and Latino candidates, the Black and Latinos endorsements, and calls to support a Black-Latino coalition. Here I find that White voters are not supportive of Black candidates, but do not differentiate between Latino candidates. Taken together, these results suggest that Blacks and Latinos are open to out-group candidates with endorsements and these candidates can actually highlight a Black–Latino Coalition, without being penalized by White voters. As final test of the theory, I consider the relationship between treatments and racial attitudes among Blacks, Latinos, and Whites. Using a nationally representative sample, I show there are some conditions where co-ethnic endorsements lead Black respondents to feel more positively towards Latinos, but this is less true for Latinos. Overall, racial attitudes do not change in light of co-ethnic endorsements. Additionally, I show that Whites’ attitudes about Latinos do not change, even why they are working with Blacks. Negative feelings about Blacks increase when a Black-Latino coalition has been formed around a Black candidate. This adds a new perspective on the debate about Racial Attitudes among Blacks, Whites, and Latinos. In “Making Coalitions. Picking Winners: How Political Organizations Influence Local Elections” (with Alexis Miller) at Urban Affairs Review. In this paper, we delve deeper into the relationship between endorsements from local organizations and vote choice in a city council election. We use the 2015 city council election in Durham, NC to provide insight into the process by which organizations and newspapers decide which candidates to endorse, provide evidence to show that candidates believe these endorsements are important, and test the claim that voters rely on endorsements even when we control for factors such as partisanship, ideology, income, and education. Given that voters may decide to support one candidate over another based on a candidate’s issue positions, we also test the claim that issue positions explain vote choice better than endorsements. We rely on interview data and exit poll data to test our claims. We take advantage of an at-large municipal election, in which voters could select up to three candidates. We find that endorsements explain vote choice for voters’ second and third choice candidates and issues do not explain vote choice as well.In “Revisiting Political Incorporation: Black Electoral and Policy Inclusion in the Bull City. The Two Dimensions of Political Incorporation: Black Politics in a Majority-Minority City,” I seek to unpack the notion of political incorporation using Durham, NC as a test cast. In that election, Black voters had a specific set of candidate preferences and those did not translate into the election of their preferred candidate. Instead, White progressives got a new Black candidate elected to the council. While this provided new descriptive representation, I ask what it means for policy incorporation. That is, does it matter that Black voters didn’t support that Black candidate if that person seeks to improve the conditions of Blacks in the city through their policy preferences? I also ask what role Black organizations play in the changing city and what this means for the growing Latino population in the city.
With Ray Block Jr., Jared Clemons, Chryl Laird, andJulian Wamble. Recent events have led to a renewed conversation surrounding the relevance and potential removal of Confederate monuments around the country, and several mon- uments have already been removed. However, we have little insight to explain why some monuments have been removed while others remain. This article seeks to understand the social and political determinants that can better explain the recent removal of Confederate monuments throughout the United States. Analyzing results from an original dataset of Confederate monuments, we identify which local government structures and racial and civic characteristics best predict the removal of these monuments. Ultimately, although we find that other factors contribute to monument removal, the size of the black population, the presence of a National Association for the Advancement of Colored People chapter, and the percentage of Democrats in a county in which a monument exists—as well as whether the monument exists in a state that constrains removal by legislative decree—best predict whether a Confederate monument will be taken down. This project elucidates the inter- play of race, partisanship, and local and statewide politics as it relates to the dismantling of Confederate monuments.
Endorsements have become a part of most election cycles. They come from a variety of sources (civic organizations, elected officials, newspapers, etc.) and are intended to signal voters that one candidate is preferential to another. Yet, there is still a lot that we do not know about endorsements. In this article, we provide insight into the process of how organizations and newspapers endorse candidates, provide evidence that demonstrates candidates believe these endorsements are important, and test the claim that voters are aware of these endorsements even when controlling for factors such as partisanship, ideology, and education. We also test the claim that issue positions explain vote choice better than endorsements. We rely on interview data and exit poll data to test our claims. Using data from an at- large municipal election, in which voters selected up to three candidates, we find that awareness of endorsements explains vote choice better than issues.
Black and Latino voters support coethnic candidates at high rates in local elections. What is less clear is how Black and Latino voters respond to out- group candidates when they do not have the option to support a coethnic candidate. I posit that when race and ethnicity become salient in a campaign, endorsements from Black and Latino leaders and organizations increase support of out-group candidates among Blacks and Latinos. I find that this hypothesis is strongly supported among Blacks. However, the same is not true for Latinos, most likely because of the political heterogeneity of the group. Using data from a survey experiment, I show that Black endorsements of minority out-group candidates are persuasive for Blacks, while comparable endorsements from Latinos are not as influential among Latinos.
This book examines racial and ethnic coalition building in local elections and considers Black and Latino political incorporation more broadly. Although many argue that Black and Latino voters have much to gain from alliances that advance shared interests, coalitions between the two groups have not always formed easily or been stable over time. Recent mayoral elections across the country show different patterns of out-group candidate support. This book seeks to explain these variations and the specific conditions under which Blacks and Latinos vote for the same candidate. Drawing on large-n observational data, survey experiments, and qualitative case studies, Andrea Benjamin develops a theory of co- ethnic endorsements, which points to the significance of elite cues from Black and Latino leaders. This book demonstrates that voters use elite co- ethnic endorsements to help inform their votes, that they do so particularly when race is salient in an election, and that this has real implications for representation and access to political benefits.
I was quoted here: Biden and Trump Are Fighting Each Other in a Changed World
Black Endorsements in the 2020 Democratic Primary.
Diversity in the Primary Process.
Op-ed about Public Opinion about the Protests.
Confederate Monument Removal
Stacey Abrams showed that Democrats can match the GOP at state-level organizing
Reform movements can’t last without hope. The Chauvin jury gave us some
Polls show strong support for the protests — and also for how police handled them
I was the first guest on this show!
I was the first return guest!
Cookie Policy
About this Cookie Policy
This Cookie Policy is provided as an addition to this site's Privacy Notice and exists to explain what cookies are and how they are used on this site. Cookies are tiny text files that are stored within your web broswer or hard drive when you visit a website or web applicaiton. These cookies allow servers to deliver content tailored to individual users or understand user behavior.
Types of Cookies we use
This site employs two first-party cookies (served from us and by us that are essential for the site to operate) and two third-party cookies that deliver external services.
First-Party Cookies
We use a server-generated session cookie to remember you when you are logged in to the site. This is essential to making sure that your profile details are those that are updated when you log in to make changes. This also lets us know who is logging into the site and when.
This site also uses a cookie that is created by your browser to remember when you agree to the cookie notice popup. This cookie stores nothing but the word "true" if you have agreed to the terms and is deleted when you close your browser. This cookie's only function is to prevent the cookie notice from popping up every time you refresh the site's homepage.
Third-Party Cookies
This site uses Google Analytics to understand usage trends and server performance. We do not store variables which are personally-identifiable in Google Analytics like browser ids or IP addresses. Google's privacy policy can be found here. If you would prefer have your browser stop supplying information to Google Analytics, Google provides a browser extension to allow you to do so.
This site also uses cookies supplied by Twitter when the Twitter sidebar script is loaded on the homepage. Their cookie policy is available here. Third-party cookies from Twitter are only loaded on this site's homepage and only when you agree to the terms or click the Twitter logo in the navigation bar.
How to Disable Cookies Altogether
Information on how to disable cookies in your browser can be found here. Please keep in mind that disabling cookies will prevent the essential functions of most interactive websites and web applications, this site included.
Privacy Notice
This privacy notice discloses the privacy practices for (womenalsoknowstuff.com). This privacy notice applies solely to information collected by this website. It will notify you of the following:
Information Collection, Use, and Sharing
We are the sole owners of the information collected on this site. We only have access to/collect information that you voluntarily give us via completing your profile or from direct contact from you. We will not sell or rent this information to anyone. However, as you are voluntarily providing your information to a publicly searchable database, anyone using the site will be able to access your information in the directory. We will use your information to respond to you, regarding the reason you contacted us. We will not share your information with any third party outside of our organization. However, anything you enter into your directory profile is publicly searchable and available to anyone using the site. Unless you ask us not to, we may contact you via email in the future to tell you about changes to this privacy policy. Your Access to and Control Over Information You may opt out of any future contacts from us at any time. You can do the following at any time by logging into your account/profile or by contacting us via email.
Security
We take precautions to protect your information. When you submit information via the website, your information is protected both online and offline. Wherever we collect information (provided by you), such as professional information or account passwords, that information is encrypted and transmitted to us in a secure way. You can verify this by looking for a lock icon in the address bar and looking for "https" at the beginning of the address of the Web page. While we use encryption to protect sensitive information transmitted online, we also protect your information offline. We do not have access to your account password, as this information is encrypted and not available to any other site users or administrators. If you forget your password, you may request a password reset. If you feel that we are not abiding by this privacy policy, you should contact us immediately.
Contact Us
If you have any questions about this Privacy Notice, or need to contact us, we can be reached at .
Terms and Conditions
Last updated: August 04, 2019
Please read these Terms and Conditions ("Terms", "Terms and Conditions") carefully before using the http://womenalsoknowstuff.com website (the "Service") operated by Women Also Know Stuff ("us", "we", or "our"). Your access to and use of the Service is conditioned upon your acceptance of and compliance with these Terms. These Terms apply to all visitors, users and others who wish to access or use the Service. By accessing or using the Service you agree to be bound by these Terms. If you disagree with any part of the terms then you do not have permission to access the Service.
Content
Our Service allows you to post, link, store, share and otherwise make available certain information, text, graphics, videos, or other material ("Content"). You are responsible for the Content that you post on or through the Service, including its legality, reliability, and appropriateness. By posting Content on or through the Service, You represent and warrant that: (i) the Content is yours (you own it) and/or you have the right to use it and the right to grant us the rights and license as provided in these Terms, and (ii) that the posting of your Content on or through the Service does not violate the privacy rights, publicity rights, copyrights, contract rights or any other rights of any person or entity. We reserve the right to terminate the account of anyone found to be infringing on a copyright. You retain any and all of your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Service and you are responsible for protecting those rights. We take no responsibility and assume no liability for Content you or any third party posts on or through the Service. However, by posting Content using the Service you grant us the right and license to use, modify, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce, and distribute such Content on and through the Service. You agree that this license includes the right for us to make your Content available to other users of the Service, who may also use your Content subject to these Terms. Women Also Know Stuff has the right but not the obligation to monitor and edit all Content provided by users. In addition, Content found on or through this Service are the property of Women Also Know Stuff or used with permission. You may not distribute, modify, transmit, reuse, download, repost, copy, or use said Content, whether in whole or in part, for commercial purposes or for personal gain, without express advance written permission from us.
Accounts
When you create an account with us, you guarantee that you are above the age of 18, are a woman in the academic field of Political Science, and that the information you provide us is accurate, complete, and current at all times. Inaccurate, incomplete, or obsolete information may result in the immediate termination of your account on the Service. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your account and password, including but not limited to the restriction of access to your computer and/or account. You agree to accept responsibility for any and all activities or actions that occur under your account and/or password, whether your password is with our Service or a third-party service. You must notify us immediately upon becoming aware of any breach of security or unauthorized use of your account.
Intellectual Property
The Service and its original content (excluding Content provided by users), features and functionality are and will remain the exclusive property of Women Also Know Stuff and its licensors. The Service is protected by copyright, trademark, and other laws of both the United States and foreign countries. Our trademarks and trade dress may not be used in connection with any product or service without the prior written consent of Women Also Know Stuff. Links To Other Web Sites Our Service may contain links to third party web sites or services that are not owned or controlled by Women Also Know Stuff Women Also Know Stuff has no control over, and assumes no responsibility for the content, privacy policies, or practices of any third party web sites or services. We do not warrant the offerings of any of these entities/individuals or their websites. You acknowledge and agree that Women Also Know Stuff shall not be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with use of or reliance on any such content, goods or services available on or through any such third party web sites or services. We strongly advise you to read the terms and conditions and privacy policies of any third party web sites or services that you visit.
Termination
We may terminate or suspend your account and bar access to the Service immediately, without prior notice or liability, under our sole discretion, for any reason whatsoever and without limitation, including but not limited to a breach of the Terms. If you wish to terminate your account, you may simply discontinue using the Service, or notify us that you wish to delete your account. All provisions of the Terms which by their nature should survive termination shall survive termination, including, without limitation, ownership provisions, warranty disclaimers, indemnity and limitations of liability.
Indemnification
You agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Women Also Know Stuff and its licensee and licensors, and their employees, contractors, agents, officers and directors, from and against any and all claims, damages, obligations, losses, liabilities, costs or debt, and expenses (including but not limited to attorney's fees), resulting from or arising out of a) your use and access of the Service, by you or any person using your account and password; b) a breach of these Terms, or c) Content posted on the Service.
Limitation Of Liability
In no event shall Women Also Know Stuff, nor its directors, employees, partners, agents, suppliers, or affiliates, be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages, including without limitation, loss of profits, data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, resulting from (i) your access to or use of or inability to access or use the Service; (ii) any conduct or content of any third party on the Service; (iii) any content obtained from the Service; and (iv) unauthorized access, use or alteration of your transmissions or content, whether based on warranty, contract, tort (including negligence) or any other legal theory, whether or not we have been informed of the possibility of such damage, and even if a remedy set forth herein is found to have failed of its essential purpose.
Disclaimer
Your use of the Service is at your sole risk. The Service is provided on an "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" basis. The Service is provided without warranties of any kind, whether express or implied, including, but not limited to, implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement or course of performance. Women Also Know Stuff, its subsidiaries, affiliates, and its licensors do not warrant that a) the Service will function uninterrupted, secure or available at any particular time or location; b) any errors or defects will be corrected; c) the Service is free of viruses or other harmful components; or d) the results of using the Service will meet your requirements.
Exclusions
Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of certain warranties or the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages, so the limitations above may not apply to you.
Governing Law
These Terms shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Arizona and the United States, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. Our failure to enforce any right or provision of these Terms will not be considered a waiver of those rights. If any provision of these Terms is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court, the remaining provisions of these Terms will remain in effect. These Terms constitute the entire agreement between us regarding our Service, and supersede and replace any prior agreements we might have had between us regarding the Service.
Changes
We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to modify or replace these Terms at any time. If a revision is material we will provide at least 30 days notice prior to any new terms taking effect. What constitutes a material change will be determined at our sole discretion. By continuing to access or use our Service after any revisions become effective, you agree to be bound by the revised terms. If you do not agree to the new terms, you are no longer authorized to use the Service.
Contact Us
If you have any questions about these Terms, please contact us at .